Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Tommy Paul vs Laslo Djere Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Paul vs Djere analysis and find out who is favored!
Tommy Paul vs Laslo Djere Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Paul 1 - 0 Djere
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Paul has won 55.74% of points on their second serve, while Djere has won 47.85%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Paul, in recent form, has won 53.43% of their opponent's second serve points, while Djere has won 50.29%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.14% and 26.92% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Paul has saved 66.48% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Djere has saved 64.29% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Paul has won 64.79% of matches played (W/L 46/ 25), with Djere winning 51.06% (W/L 24/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Paul has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 122/ 67), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 61% (W/L 22/ 14). Djere has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 291/ 150), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 35% (W/L 7/ 13).
- Player level: In the last year, Paul has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 63.33% of matches (W/L 19/ 11), where as Djere has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 57.14% of matches (W/L 16/ 12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Paul winning 1 times and Djere being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Paul winning 2 and Djere winning 0. The last match between Paul and Djere was at the Winston-Salem Open - Winston-Salem, 20-08-2018, First, Hard with Tommy Paul getting the victory 6-3 7-6(4).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:21:29.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Paul and Djere have played a deciding set 0 times, with Paul winning 0 times and Djere 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Paul winning 1, and Djere 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Paul has played against opponents with an average rank of 140.13 while Djere has played against players with an average rank of 143.32.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Paul has won 52% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Djere has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Paul has converted 43.1% of breakpoint opportunities, and Djere has converted 42.67% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
14
Rank
12
High
27
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
52
Rank
27
High
28
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
Form
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
64% (405-231)
Career Total W/L
58% (386-275)
72% (21-8)
YTD W/L
25% (3-9)
$5,922,800
Career Prize Money
$3,086,075
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Tommy Paul | Laslo Djere |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 7 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:21:29 | 1:21:29 |
| 1st Serve % | 73% (48/66) | 59% (38/64) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 85% (41/48) | 76% (29/38) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 44% (8/18) | 58% (15/26) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 25% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 31% (20/64) | 26% (17/66) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-6(4) |
Stats 
Tommy Paul
Player
Laslo Djere
73%
(
48 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
3
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
85%
(
41 of
48)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
29 of
38)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
17 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
20 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
61
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Tommy Paul | Laslo Djere |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 72% (21/8) | 25% (3/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 70% (52/22) | 38% (12/20) |
| Games Win/Loss | 57% (387/291) | 48% (152/167) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 63% (10/6) | 25% (1/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 78% (7/2) | 25% (2/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 100% (4/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.44 | 0.33 |
| Aces Total | 147 | 52 |
| DFs per game | 0.16 | 0.2 |
| DFs Total | 52 | 31 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:52:30 | 2:9:34 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 140.76 | 130.42 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (1309/2163) | 65% (687/1059) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (929/1309) | 68% (470/687) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 56% (476/854) | 48% (178/372) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (103/239) | 43% (32/75) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (954/2252) | 35% (343/972) |
| Slam W/L | 80% (4/1) | 0% (0/2) |
| Masters W/L | 69% (9/4) | 33% (1/2) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 73% (8/3) | 33% (2/4) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 74% (17/23) | 33% (3/9) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 80% (4/5) | 0% (0/2) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 57% (4/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (5/10) | 20% (1/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 86% (22/19) | 67% (3/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 9% (22/2) | 33% (3/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 29% (7/2) | 11% (9/1) |
Tommy Paul Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Tommy Paul
Player
Fabio Fognini
50%
(
31 of
62)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
7
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
71%
(
22 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
16 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
37 of
65)
83
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tommy Paul
Player
Pedro Cachin
55%
(
37 of
67)
1st Serve %
59%
(
54 of
91)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
21 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
51 of
91)
97
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Nicolas Jarry
Player
Tommy Paul
66%
(
78 of
118)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
88)
13
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
52 of
78)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
37 of
55)
53%
(
21 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
38%
(
45 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
30 of
88)
103
Total Points Won
103
|
6-3 6-7(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tommy Paul
Player
Hubert Hurkacz
69%
(
81 of
117)
1st Serve %
54%
(
52 of
97)
3
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
1
54%
(
44 of
81)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
45%
(
53 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
47 of
97)
111
Total Points Won
103
|
7-5 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Tommy Paul
Player
Daniil Medvedev
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
45%
(
19 of
42)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Tommy Paul
Player
Dominik Koepfer
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
79)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
77
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tommy Paul
Player
Aslan Karatsev
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
33%
(
22 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
22 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Tommy Paul
66%
(
68 of
103)
1st Serve %
66%
(
63 of
95)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
74%
(
50 of
68)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
41 of
63)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
37 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
40 of
95)
106
Total Points Won
92
|
6-7(7) 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tommy Paul
Player
Lukas Klein
56%
(
58 of
104)
1st Serve %
66%
(
58 of
88)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
78%
(
45 of
58)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
42 of
58)
59%
(
27 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
31%
(
32 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
88)
105
Total Points Won
87
|
6-7(5) 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martin Damm
Player
Tommy Paul
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
10
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
0%
(
0 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
15 of
44)
43
Total Points Won
43
|
4-6 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Laslo Djere Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Altmaier
Player
Laslo Djere
67%
(
122 of
183)
1st Serve %
63%
(
137 of
217)
11
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
6
73%
(
89 of
122)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
95 of
137)
52%
(
32 of
61)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
38 of
80)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
34%
(
62 of
183)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
84 of
217)
205
Total Points Won
195
|
7-5 6-4 6-7(6) 5-7 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stefanos Tsitsipas
Player
Laslo Djere
52%
(
26 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
23 of
41)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
50
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 3-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Fabio Fognini
Player
Laslo Djere
64%
(
58 of
90)
1st Serve %
71%
(
69 of
97)
3
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
50 of
69)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
36%
(
32 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
32 of
97)
90
Total Points Won
97
|
7-6(1) 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Karen Khachanov
Player
Laslo Djere
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
6
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
21%
(
4 of
19)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Laslo Djere
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
71%
(
63 of
89)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
86)
4
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
38)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
86)
94
Total Points Won
81
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dusan Lajovic
Player
Laslo Djere
75%
(
47 of
63)
1st Serve %
70%
(
49 of
70)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
0
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Laslo Djere
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
39 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andrea Vavassori
Player
Laslo Djere
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
55%
(
31 of
56)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Laslo Djere
Player
Marin Cilic
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
48 of
84)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
73%
(
19 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
25%
(
16 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
84)
86
Total Points Won
63
|
4-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 4 |
Stats
Lukas Pokorny
Player
Laslo Djere
56%
(
14 of
25)
1st Serve %
65%
(
11 of
17)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
10 of
14)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
40%
(
10 of
25)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
22
Total Points Won
20
|
4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Paul Vs Djere Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Tommy Paul
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
